Severity and 1-month outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with solid cancers: a Danish nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are vulnerable to infections, are older and often have comorbidities in comparison to the general population, which increases the risk for severe outcomes related to COVID-19 diagnosis. METHODS: This study is a prospective, nationwide study in patients with solid cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection included between 10 March to 15 June 2020. Patient's baseline characteristics were collected. The study's primary outcome was overall survival within 30 days of verified SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondary outcomes were hospital admission, admission to an ICU, and need for supplemental oxygen. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients with a cancer diagnosis and verified SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified. After one month of follow up, hospitalization was required for 54% (n = 61) and 21% of the patients had died and 14 of the 23 deceased cancer patients were ≥70 years. Most patients were classified with mild COVID-19 symptoms (66%, n = 74); however, 48% (n = 23) of the ≥70-year-olds patients were classified with severe or critical COVID-19 symptoms. Among the total study population, 61% (n = 68) had comorbidities and comorbidity were more frequently observed among the deceased (91%, n = 21) and older cancer patients (≥70 years, 81%, n = 39). CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledging the low sample size in this study, our work shows that age and comorbidities, but not recent cytotoxic therapy, are associated with adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection for patients with solid cancer. Particularly, patients with progressive disease seem to be at greater risk of a fatal outcome from COVID-19.HighlightsAge, performance status, and comorbidities are strong predictors of adverse outcome in cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.Patients with progressive cancer disease seem to be at greater risk of a fatal outcome from COVID-19.Recent cytotoxic therapy, however, did not seem to be associated with increased risk for adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection for patients with solid cancer.

Sino-nasal cancer in Denmark 1982-1991--a nationwide survey.

Cancer of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses is a rare disease. The many different histologies and sites make the management of this disease a challenge. The current report from the Danish Society for Head and Neck Oncology comprises a joint analysis of five retrospective series covering the entire country, with 315 patients seen in the 10-year period from 1 January 1982 to 31 December 1991. Tumour sites were nasal cavity (n = 156), maxillary sinus (n = 139), ethmoid sinus (n = 14), sphenoid sinus (n = 5) and frontal sinus (one case). The most common histologies included squamous cell carcinoma (126 cases), adenocarcinoma (41 cases), malignant melanoma (38 cases) and malignant lymphoma (34 cases). A total of 284 patients (90%) received treatment with curative intent; most of these patients were treated with radiotherapy, either alone (120 patients) or in combination with surgery (111 patients). There was no significant difference between the five centres in disease specific survival and overall survival. The results showed that histology, localization and nodal involvement were significant prognostic factors for locoregional control and survival. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma had a significantly poorer prognosis compared with patients with adenocarcinoma. However, a Cox multivariate analysis revealed that this was likely the result of tumour localization, as most adenocarcinomas were in the nasal cavity. The experience from this data collection has inspired the Danish Society for Head and Neck Oncology to arrange common data registration of several other clinical head and neck series. In the future, the Society plans to expand this activity further.

Preliminary results of a phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and cisplatin are cytotoxic drugs active against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that possess additive cytotoxicity in animal tumors. Paclitaxel and cisplatin are active in patients with advanced NSCLC when given on a 3-weekly schedule. In an attempt to increase activity, we designed a phase II study with a biweekly schedule. Paclitaxel 110 mg/m2 was given by 3-hour intravenous infusion, followed by cisplatin 60 mg/m2 via intravenous infusion. Treatment was scheduled every 2 weeks. Of the 42 patients treated, 19 were men and 23 were women, with a median age of 54 years (range, 31 to 69 years). Four patients had stage IIIA NSCLC, 18 stage IIIB, and 20 stage IV. Median World Health Organization performance status was 1 (range, 0 to 2), and adenocarcinoma was the most common histology (52%). A median of nine cycles was administered (range, one to 24 cycles), with more than 360 cycles administered. Rates of frequency of World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia, 20%; thrombocytopenia, 2%; nausea/vomiting, 7% (despite prophylactic treatment with 5-HT3 receptor antagonists plus prednisolone); neurotoxicity, 2%; and nephrotoxicity, 2%. There were three septicemic episodes, no bleeding episodes, and no toxic deaths. Dose reduction was performed in 15 patients (36%), due to nephrotoxicity in 14 cases. Treatment delay was necessary in 23 patients (55%), most often due to neutropenia (nine cases). Forty patients are currently evaluable for response, with two complete and 15 partial responses (overall response rate, 43%; 95% confidence limits, 27% to 59%). Median response duration was 31 weeks (range, 9 to 85 weeks). The biweekly schedule of paclitaxel plus cisplatin has noteworthy activity in patients with NSCLC. A relatively large fraction of patients required either dose reduction and/or treatment delay, but World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 toxicity was rare, apart from the neutropenia that caused only a few septicemic episodes.